Friday, March 27, 2015  Proportional Viewing Options. 800 1024 1280 1440 1680 1920 Currently Viewing - 1024 ! Port Stanley Weather
News Regional National Events Weather Community Directory Sports Real Estate Classifieds Photos Video Contact Us
BRENDA JOHNSTON RE/MAX Sales Rubyeyes Kraftwerks Mickeys Boathouse Weekly Specials Elgin Chrysler Dodge Jeep click here to viewFoster and Adoption Training
News / Letters
More Letters   -  1 2 3 4 More Letters, 83 available.
Heritage Debate
  February 7, 2014  
 Heritage Committee
 Heritage Debate 
 Port Stanley Harbour Assessment
 Crowdsource our 150th Logo
 Harbour Risk Assessment
 A Hero Among Us
 Provincial Election Also Critical
 Local Newsmakers
 Heritage ? Why Now ?
 Asset Management Plan
 It is time to put an end to Heritage Districts
 Letter from the Minister of Transportation
 Thanks to You and Central Elgin
 Dickens Day Parade Thank You
 Where Have All the Litter Containers Gone ?
 Balanced Federal Budget
 Selbourne Park Fire Hall
 A Diamond in the Rough
 Paid Parking on the Beach Success
 Designation and Property Rights
 Golfer Falls Down
 Reply to Stan Beleutz
 Cost of Stupidity
 Why do we need a new firehall ?

As the recent Heritage meeting made clear, the adoption of Heritage District legislation remains a hotly debated issue. Certainly members of the advisory committee are to be thanked for their efforts on behalf of Port Stanley and the way in which they altered the initial Heritage plan in an attempt to accommodate concerns raised at the previous meeting.

Unlike the Heritage Advisory Committee, I believe property owners have a right to do with their own property as they see fit ... within the bounds of zoning by-laws and regulations. The Heritage Advisory Committee thinks Ontario Heritage District legislation, which limits the ability of Municipal Council to grant variances to by-laws, is the best way to keep Council from yielding to pressure from property owners or developers to bend the rules on a case-by-case basis. (Council can be pressured to grant variances under threat by developers or others to go to the Ontario Municipal Board.) The Heritage Advisory Committee argues that the Heritage District Legislation is the best way to keep the likes of MacDonalds, strip plazas and high rise buildings from spoiling our village charm.

I suggest the Heritage Advisory Committee limit itself to recommending specific guidelines related mainly to the above mentioned threats. Certainly individual home owners should not be subject to additional regulation. Public education would be a more democratic way to encourage property owners to support broadly accepted community goals.

Guy Goodwin
Port Stanley, ON

Friday, March 27, 2015 | Welcome Guest! | Login | Home | Terms of Use | RSS Feeds
World's 1st Proportional Viewing News Web Site. February 5, 2008. Copyright ©
Send mail to with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2004 - 2015 Port Stanley All Rights Reserved ISSN 1718-8695