Thursday, July 30, 2015  Proportional Viewing Options. 800 1024 1280 1440 1680 1920 Currently Viewing - 1024 ! Port Stanley Weather
News Regional National Events Weather Community Directory Sports Real Estate Classifieds Photos Video Contact Us
Kettle Creek Golf Club Quaker Barrel Century 21 First Canadian Corp Flowers by Rosita click here to viewDockside Cabs -
News / Letters
More Letters   -  1 2 3 4 More Letters, 83 available.
Heritage Committee
  February 7, 2014  
 Paid Parking 2014
 Time for a Beard Trim
 My Decision to Retire
 New Parking Meters
 Bike Rodeo
 Open Letter from Barker Gang
 Kindness at The Buccaneer
 Re Asset Management Plan
 Re Code of Conduct for Councillors
 Honouring the Sacrifices of our Afghan Vets
 BIA Meeting Results
 Little Beach Clean Up
 Please Sir can we have more garbage cans
 Fair Election Act
 Is Bigger Better
 Re Council misled the people in Eastwood
 Re Frittering the Fund
 Simply Put They Do Not Know What They Want ?
 Re Heritage Conservation District Public Letter
 Heritage Committee 
 Heritage Debate
 Port Stanley Harbour Assessment
 Crowdsource our 150th Logo

I don't think there is a pleasant way to comment on the Heritage Preservation Committee, but I'm going to try anyway.

First, some people have too much free time on their hands. Would the committee members consider the possibility of re-directing their energies towards something that would benefit us all, such as attracting new businesses or developing new attractions for tourism?

Second, some of these people do not even own properties in the effected area, and all of the committee members have wrapped themselves in an air of respectability by giving themselves a fancy title - with the sole purpose of abrogating the rights of the affected owners.

Personally, I find the possibility that there is an attempt to gain another level of authority between us and the already existing municipal government objectionable. We need less government, whether this committee exists apart from the municipality or as a new department within it.

What justification is there for not first involving each effected land owner and gaining their overwhelming approval? Finally, despite opposition to their plans, this committee proceeds to move forward, representing themselves as being democratic! A new form of democracy?!

I challenge the committee to organize a vote involving all land owners in Port Stanley, or maybe just by the people in the effected area.

Dave McKee
Port Stanley, ON

Thursday, July 30, 2015 | Welcome Guest! | Login | Home | Terms of Use | RSS Feeds
World's 1st Proportional Viewing News Web Site. February 5, 2008. Copyright ©
Send mail to with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2004 - 2015 Port Stanley All Rights Reserved ISSN 1718-8695